ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenCupraDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo, 1995 - 1996
1995 in January, the world saw a third-generation street flyer. It now looked more serious with a new front bumper (to better direct air to the radiator, intercooler and brakes), an aluminum bonnet and a once-increased rear spoiler. The new TDO5-16G6-7 turbine, new exhaust system and increased compression ratio brought an additional 10 hp of power, the torque did not change. Excellent engine data: 2.0 L 4G63T 270 hp (201 kW) / 6250 rpm power, torque 309 Nm / 3000 rpm, weight only 1260 kg. The car is obviously not designed for quiet driving.
|
BODYWORK |
Lancer Evolution III |
Body type |
Saloon |
Number of doors |
4 |
Number of seats |
5 |
Luggage capacity, litres |
n/d |
ENGINE |
Fuel type |
Petrol |
Fuel system |
n/d |
Engine type |
4 cylinders inline Turbine |
Position of engine |
n/d |
Engine capacity, cc |
1997 |
Cylinders/valves |
4/16 |
Power output, bhp/kW/rpm |
270/201/6250 |
Torque, Nm/rpm |
309/3000 |
Acceleration 0-62 mph, s |
0 |
Top speed |
180 km/h (112 mph) |
TRANSMISSION |
Drive wheels |
All |
Steering type |
n/d |
Gearbox |
Mechanical
|
DIMENSIONS/WEIGHT |
Length, mm |
4310 |
Width, mm |
1695 |
Height, mm |
1420 |
Weight/Max Weight, kg |
1260 |
Wheelbase, mm |
2510 |
CHASSIS |
Front suspension |
Nepriklausoma MacPherson |
Rear suspension |
Nepriklausoma daugiasvirtė |
Front brakes |
n/d |
Rear brakes |
n/d |
Front tires |
n/d |
Rear tires |
n/d |
FUEL CONSUMPTION |
Urban |
n/d |
Extra urban |
n/d |
Combined |
n/d |
CO2 emissions, g/km |
n/d |
Fuel tank capacity, litres |
n/d |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo TOP competitors
|
|
|